- Lost in the World Wide Web (help)
- https://schrottkatze.de
- Joined on
2023-05-03
I think this one also depends on #2, so lets get that finally merged first :)
The highlighted "you're* feels a bit, maybe split it into "you are" and highlight the "you"? (small nitpicky wording thing lol)
Is that explicit agreement that you're okay with both the CC BY-SA 4.0 and the AGPL?
Yes. The image should be under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and my code under the AGPL.
What do you refer to by…
In that case, I wouldn't name them anyway. But I think that might be easier in some cases for some people. However, I take the idea back since it's tbh useless for debugging since that's not…
As long as no creative work is done, I don't see how it could cause potential harm.
Of course it can't.
It does not restrict entities from using whatever they want.
It sounds like we…
AGPL is lovely!
Maybe also add a pointer to the node each time? Or do you think that'd have a significant performance impact or something?
I'd just remove the tool-list. Since it's just suggestions anyway. Or at least remove programs like inkscape, of which we won't have in-house custom files in the project. Yes, Ik that inkscape…
CC-BY-SA.
Not that I care much about it, but yeah.
Once the project progresses, I'll maybe bother rendering it with a lot more data (normals, cryptomatte, whatever) for debugging/example…
Idk, I just think that that might be useful for hand-written IR (which, don't get me wrong, is not the indended use case obviously. But that might make it a lot easier to debug more complex stuff…
Okay. Probably will have to write it again if we publisize the project then some day, but until then we have more then enough time
Do you mean returning the ID of the place it failed and potentially more information (depending on the errors, edges, other ids...)?
These random rails for now? I know the license situation because well... I made it myself. Probably isn't optimal either, though.