feat: graph-ir (continueing #6) #10
1 changed files with 15 additions and 21 deletions
|
@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ impl GraphIr {
|
|||
// no, not today
|
||||
pub fn topological_sort(&self) -> Vec<Instruction> {
|
||||
// count how many incoming edges each vertex has
|
||||
let input_counts: Map<_, usize> =
|
||||
let nonzero_input_counts: Map<_, usize> =
|
||||
self.rev_edges
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.fold(Map::new(), |mut count, (input, _)| {
|
||||
|
@ -199,22 +199,14 @@ impl GraphIr {
|
|||
count
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// could experiment with a VecDeque here
|
||||
let mut active_queue = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// what vertices can we start with? in other words, which ones have 0 inputs?
|
||||
let unresolved_input_count: Map<id::Instruction, usize> = input_counts
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|(instr, count)| {
|
||||
dbg!(count);
|
||||
if count == 0 {
|
||||
active_queue.push(instr);
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Some((instr, count))
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
// are there any unconnected ones we could start with?
|
||||
// TODO: experiment if a VecDeque with some ordering fun is digested better by the executor
|
||||
let no_inputs: Vec<_> = {
|
||||
let nonzero: Set<_> = nonzero_input_counts.keys().collect();
|
||||
let all: Set<_> = self.instructions.keys().collect();
|
||||
all.difference(&nonzero).copied().collect()
|
||||
};
|
||||
let mut active_queue = no_inputs;
|
||||
|
||||
// then let's find the order!
|
||||
let mut order = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
@ -224,25 +216,27 @@ impl GraphIr {
|
|||
// make sure all dependents notice that
|
||||
|
||||
for dependent in self
|
||||
.dependents(¤t)
|
||||
.dependents(current)
|
||||
.expect("graph to be consistent")
|
||||
.flatten()
|
||||
{
|
||||
dbg!(dependent);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
order.push(self.resolve(¤t).expect("graph to be consistent"));
|
||||
// TODO: check if this instruction is "well-fed", that is, has all the inputs it needs,
|
||||
// and if not, panic
|
||||
order.push(self.resolve(current).expect("graph to be consistent"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!unresolved_input_count.is_empty(),
|
||||
!nonzero_input_counts.is_empty(),
|
||||
concat!(
|
||||
"topological sort didn't cover all instructions\n",
|
||||
"either there are unconnected inputs, or there is a cycle\n",
|
||||
"unresolved instructions:\n",
|
||||
"{:#?}"
|
||||
),
|
||||
unresolved_input_count
|
||||
nonzero_input_counts,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
order
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue